|
|
Search MSO Worldwide |
| MSO Events | Mind Sports Zine | Brain Power | Play Games Online | Community | Links |
|
|
Appeal No 2 |
||
|
Misinformation
Event: Life Master Pairs, 12 August, second semifinal session Board 3
The Facts: 2 The Appeal: E/W appealed the Director's ruling. North and West were the only players to attend the hearing. West believed that had he known South was making a support double, he might have bid 2NT. He believed that North should not have removed the double. North said that South was a relatively inexperienced player (a student of his, though a Life Master). He had explained at the table that his partner might have meant the double as Support, though he wasn't sure. He believed that removing the double was the right action with his hand. The Committee's decision: The Committee
believed that North went out of his way to explain the possibilities for
his partner's double, that it was possibly meant as a Support Double,
and that she was relatively inexperienced. At this point E/W could have
asked North to leave the table and had South explain the intent of the
double. The Committee believed that the decision North had made to bid
2 The Committee allowed the table result to stand and believed the appeal just barely met the standard of having merit because N/S were not totally clear on their agreement.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||