|
|
Search MSO Worldwide |
| MSO Events | Mind Sports Zine | Brain Power | Play Games Online | Community | Links |
|
| |
|
Appeals
Appeal
No 34.
Open Teams Round 31 Board 8.
Contract: Five Clubs, played by
East. The Director: Ruled that a Pass for West was a logical alternative to the suggested action of pulling the slow double. Ruling: Score adjusted to Four Hearts doubled, made, +590 to North/South. East/West appealed. The Players: East/West explained
that the pass of Four Hearts was forcing; on this type of sequence they
cannot be pre-empted below their own game level (five clubs) and all passes
below that are forcing. They were not able to arrive in five clubs more
quickly because their methods are to reverse the usual principle that
quick arrival indicates no interest in proceeding further. For this pair
the delayed arrival is weaker than the quick arrival which would show
a mild interest in slam. The Committee: Was surprised to hear of the E/W style of bidding and considered it should be mentioned on the convention card. In the absence of such corroborative evidence, and since there was unauthorised information, the Committee decided against the East/West pair. The Committee's decision: Director's decision upheld. Relevant Laws: Law 16A, Law 12C2 Deposit: Returned |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||